<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/rss_2.0/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <title>shortcuts</title>
    <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/index/</link>
    <description>A collection of notes, ideas and thoughts from an American in The Netherlands</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>jtrascap@mac.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-05-31T08:28:14+00:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>Font Management in OS X, 10.4&#45;10.6</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/font_management_in_os_x_10.4&#45;10.6/</link>
      <description>Fonts in OS X seems to change in every version. They&#8217;re a mystery, wrapped in a puzzle, often dotted with a umlaut and an accent&#45;grave. Whether you&#8217;re a a Flash developer wondering why your final Helvetica looks larger than it should be, or a print designer who&#8217;s output looks strangely un&#45;kerned, this link is for you&#8230;</description>
      <dc:subject>Gadgetry, IT notes, Project 52</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know nothing about JKL Studios other than they&#8217;ve got <a href="http://www.jklstudios.com/misc/osxfonts.html">the most detailed and easy-to-understand overview</a> I&#8217;ve seen about Mac font management. </p>

<p>Read it. <br />
Learn it. <br />
Live it. </p>

<p>And <a href="http://www.jklstudios.com/misc/Font_Management_in_OS_X.pdf">download the PDF</a> for when you stupidly remove the LucidaGrande.dfont from your /System/Library/Fonts/ directory. </p>

<p>No&#8230;I admit to nothing. 
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-05-31T07:28:14+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/font_management_in_os_x_10.4&#45;10.6/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Podcasts not syncing &#45; here&#8217;s the fix</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/podcasts_not_syncing_&#45;_heres_the_fix/</link>
      <description>Can&#8217;t sync your podcasts? Playlists with podcasts don&#8217;t show up on your iPhone? Here&#8217;s the fix..</description>
      <dc:subject>Gadgetry, IT notes, Project 52</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Previously the Podcast bug affected only the playlist order, but in the current iTunes 9.0.3 and iPhone 3.1.3 firmware (for example) the bug will remove any Podcast in a playlist from the iPod section of the device. If the Playlist is comprised of only podcasts, the playlist will not even be visible on the device (it will show in the iTunes sync). </p>

<p>To return podcasts to a playlist, you have to use the iTunes 9 trick: </p>

<li>Right-click your particular playlist and choose EDIT SMART PLAYLIST</li>
<li>Turn off LIVE UPDATING</li>
<li>SYNC</li>

<p>Then your podcasts return in a playlist in the correct order, but you&#8217;ll have to toggle it on again to update the playlist list. </p>

<p>This bug has existed since iTunes 9 and it seems to only be getting worse. Hopefully Apple will fix it soon - I can&#8217;t believe they don&#8217;t want us to listen to podcasts in a playlist! C&#8217;mon Apple - fix this already!
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-02-03T12:18:23+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/podcasts_not_syncing_&#45;_heres_the_fix/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Who Got What Wrong &#45; After the Apple Event</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/who_got_what_wrong_&#45;_after_the_apple_event/</link>
      <description>Guessing what Steve will pull out is a bit of a &#8220;mug&#8217;s game&#8221;. We all should know that by now.</description>
      <dc:subject>IT notes, Project 52</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of the mystery is not in the device or service, but what fantastical future we see Apple providing for us. Apple doesn&#8217;t promote or market these events…in fact, they hardly say a word, sending out only a invitation. In watching the media frenzy, I wonder how many people understand this, because when the blog-o-sphere doesn&#8217;t get what &#8220;they&#8221; want, the collective hue and cry makes them seem like a slighted lover holding a padded bra.</p>

<p>Not Apple&#8217;s fault you got your hopes up. You wanted to believe in every fantasy out there and so you did. That&#8217;s about your religion - not Apple. </p>

<p>Then there&#8217;s the Whispers. About a sales rep speaking higher than his pay grade, he&#8217;s a &#8220;insider with exclusive access&#8221;. Some CEO who blabs for a bit of self-promotion on every front page (but he&#8217;s not at the event&#8230;hmmm).&nbsp; Part of this is genuinely newsworthy - but for week&#8217;s we&#8217;ve seen fanboy renders and ridiculous articles that make the product everything from the Second Coming to the moment Apple lost it. Speculation, endless speculation, that drives traffic, that angers readers, that drives traffic, that engorges fanboys, that drive&#8217;s traffic, that also drives stock prices unnaturally high in expectation and hinders entire market segments. If you&#8217;re financially involved in Apple, in some commercial way, shape or form, I&#8217;d imagine you&#8217;d feel it almost your ouroborostic duty to create, conflate, regurgitate and re-gorge on every other bit of speculation out there. </p>

<p>Not Apple&#8217;s fault your stock dropped after the launch. You wanted people to believe you knew something you didn&#8217;t, that you were something you were not. Makes writing easier if you get your own &#8220;Princess Diana&#8221; to promote/slate/reconcile, I guess. A proper journalistic source? Sorry - you don&#8217;t even appear relevant this morning - you&#8217;ve been caught with a sock in your pants.</p>

<p>This is not a healthy ecosystem. Replace &#8220;the media&#8221; with &#8220;the banks&#8221; and We The People would have had them in front of Congress by now. </p>

<p>If you&#8217;re disappointed in Apple this morning, I&#8217;d say you&#8217;re blaming the wrong people. 
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-01-28T06:35:39+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/who_got_what_wrong_&#45;_after_the_apple_event/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Best quote of the day:</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/best_quote_of_the_day/</link>
      <description>&#8220;Spiteful words can hurt your feelings but silence breaks your heart.&#8221;&amp;nbsp; 
Oooh, so true.</description>
      <dc:subject>Idle Chatter, Personal, Project 52</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-01-21T13:57:43+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/best_quote_of_the_day/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The 27th cometh for the last of a 1000 times</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/the_27th_cometh_for_the_last_of_a_1000_times/</link>
      <description>Ever since my trusty Newton program was cancelled by the just&#45;returned Steve Jobs, people have been speculating about a new Apple Tablet. What they mean to say is that mouse&#45;based computing was then beginning to suck. So will does Jan 27th mean to computing? Let&#8217;s prognosticate!</description>
      <dc:subject>Gadgetry, IT notes, Malarkey, Project 52</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we can all agree - we&#8217;ve all had about enough of the Apple Tablet vapor/rumor-mill over the years. In some ways, I&#8217;m too nervous to even contemplate what the experience will be like on one. My experience with Sony smartphones never prepared me for an iPhone life; no-one saw it coming. It was new, fresh, a complete rethink of the phone experience, and while it&#8217;s not perfect, it&#8217;s a damn better world because of the iPhone.</p>

<p>I say that because people today poo-poo the Mac and it&#8217;s graphic interface, and there are generations living now that have no idea what it&#8217;s like to boot up a tape-drive and wait 5 minutes for a text adventure to start. And rightly so: these were neanderthal systems and the more advanced graphic systems left this branch of early hominid-interface far, far behind. You have to know where you came from to appreciate where you&#8217;re going. </p>

<p>For years, there was a constant howling about what the next steps should be. I genuinely missed my Newton (I still have one, a 2100, sitting on a shelf - near pristine and unused) but the downsides were too much to bear in this connected world. For years, at every coming of a MacWorld, the whispers that a new &#8220;tablet was coming&#8221; drove bloggers into a delicious madness. </p>

<p>Such speculation considered the Tablet to be a small, light Mac. With Apple&#8217;s current success, desires morphed it into a big iPhone. Big iPhone = Dumb Tablet, at least to me. The core of the iPhone&#8217;s success is it&#8217;s ability to move small bits of information to and from you - a photo, a video, a web page, a tweet. Small screen, small consumption. </p>

<p>Enter the Apple Invite for the 27th of January 2010:</p>

<p><img src="http://www.shortcuts.nl/images/uploads/images/appleinvite_sm.jpg" border="0" alt="image" name="image" width="460" height="366" /></p>

<p>Looks like whatever it is, it&#8217;s primarily a creative device. The <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2010/01/18/zaprudering-the-invite-obsessive-fun-with-tuaw/">Zapruderization</a> of the invitation has already fueled another day&#8217;s <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2010/jan/18/apple-tablet-date-confirmed">speciousness and speculation</a>. The truth is, as we always already know, not to be found on webpages anywhere. This is the age of the news we want, not the news we need. </p>

<p>I know nothing other than what I&#8217;ve experienced with the iPhone (v1 &amp; v3), my Newton, a decade of experience with Macs and my desire for a Star Trek slate handed to me by a pretty yeoman. But since blogs are a suckers game…I&#8217;m in. </p>

<p>What I&#8217;d <i>like</i> to think is this: 
</p><li>It&#8217;ll have a new interface on a stable file system: It&#8217;s not going to be a big iPhone or a Half-Mac. It&#8217;s going to involve the immediacy you find in an iPhone and the depth of a real creative device. I can&#8217;t imagine a creative tool without a descending filing system, even with tags, too many visual clues would overwhelm selection, so I&#8217;d also expect the iPhone to upgrade its flat UI very soon too</li>
<li>Hardware: The card shows a thin, round-edged border, so there&#8217;s a good likelihood when closed that the Tablet will be similar in feel to a big phone; which is to say, very ergonomic. I have faith in Apple in this regard - say what you want about any of their products, they feel good to the touch.</li>
<li>I&#8217;m going to guess it&#8217;ll not have a removable battery but a moulded one like all their other products - we&#8217;re beyond throw-away batteries.</li>
<li>Yes, it&#8217;ll be wireless - it has to be these days. Will it be 3G? Only if there&#8217;s a way to have 2 devices on the same number, but without that I doubt Apple would niche the system by making you get a second phone account. With AT&amp;T. Think about that a second and you&#8217;ll know I&#8217;m right. </li>
<li>The paint splatters everywhere give the impression of color, texture and density. Were I a betting man (and we know from past history it&#8217;s best I don&#8217;t) I would worry if I owned Wacom and PainterX stock. Possibly Adobe should worry too - this could be the cornerstone of an attack on the Creative Suite that could work if the apps were sold cheaply enough. You&#8217;d need the Tablet to use them; a reverse of the &#8220;Razor and Blades&#8221; theory, sure, but there&#8217;s plenty of other blades in the App Store, and it&#8217;s a way to get even with Adobe for the crap that CS4 and especially Flash have become.</li>

<p>But that&#8217;s all I can guess at, given what we all <b>know</b>; anything more is a mugs game. I&#8217;ve got the credit card warmed-up and parked in the garage, raring to go. I&#8217;ll let you know what happens to my bank balance in a bit over a week..
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-01-19T08:07:01+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/the_27th_cometh_for_the_last_of_a_1000_times/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Ellipses…</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/ellipses/</link>
      <description>Last year was the year to cut back on commas. This year, ellipses…

See what I mean?</description>
      <dc:subject>Idle Chatter, Living in Holland, Project 52</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blame my poor grammar on living abroad for 11+ years - use it or lose it. I&#8217;ve also noticed my speech as become more lazy, less articulated, almost texan. Then again, don&#8217;t all Americans sound like either George Bush or Woody Allen? </p>

<p>Is it too late to make a resolution?
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-01-17T07:43:50+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/ellipses/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Oh, and one more thing&#8230;</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/oh_and_one_more_thing/</link>
      <description>This design needs to die.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a quickie - what, back in 2004?</p>

<p>Die, die, die&#8230;
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-01-05T14:29:13+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/oh_and_one_more_thing/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Hello Project 52</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/hello_project_52/</link>
      <description>Project52 is a personal challenge geared toward getting fresh content on one&#8217;s website; the goal being to write at least one new article, per week, for the year.</description>
      <dc:subject>Project 52</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.shortcuts.nl/images/uploads/images/p52_100x126.png" style="float:left; margin-right:8px;">Welcome fellow Project 52&#8217;ers! </p>

<p>As you know, we&#8217;ve banded together to motivate ourselves to actually (<i>gasp!</i>) write in our own blogs. To actually put content&#8230;up. </p>

<p>Shame, shock, horror - doesn&#8217;t everyone perpetually blog?</p>

<p><i>Answer: No - not if you have a life.</i></p>

<p>Some of us have to be prompted, shamed, encouraged, lead by a carrot on a stick, and if not, then beaten with that stick. </p>

<p>Writing can be the most frustrating thing in the world. It can also be the most transformative thing too - but part of the process is getting past the &#8220;have. to. write&#8221;-pressure and  setting one&#8217;s thoughts free. Perhaps this initiative is a good thing - I&#8217;ve already written two posts this month, as well as half-built a new portfolio website. Procrastination is falling by the wayside, and co-incidentally my intake of Nespresso is on the rise. </p>

<p>(<i>Hmmm</i> - <b>Nespresso</b>. Say what you want about Nestlé, but they&#8217;re doing the Nespresso brand <a href="http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/news.cfm?id=nespresso_ecolaboration">the way</a> <a href="http://www1.nespresso.com/precom/recycling/en/home_ch_en.html">it should be</a>.)</p>

<p>Anyhoo - it&#8217;s motivation, and all motivation is good. </p>

<p>So I hope to see you, fellow Project 52&#8217;ers, here <a href="http://project52.info/">and there</a>. Check out the Google Groups Project 52 discussion and if you like it, come join us. I expect this to take shame some time, as we all learn from each other and create communal threads (perhaps every week a new discussion point might be fun..)</p>

<p>And off we go!
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-01-05T10:36:20+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/hello_project_52/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>2010 &#45; now is the time,,,</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/2010_&#45;_now_is_the_time/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject>Idle Chatter, IT notes, Project 52</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to 2010 with a mix of excitement and apprehension. Happy, not an equal mix.&nbsp; </p>

<p>Let&#8217;s cover apprehension first: I&#8217;m a web developer, and unlike many of my peers I&#8217;ve worked with only 2 big companies over the past 10 years, not hop-skipping from one job to the next. There are pluses and minuses on both sides, but for an American, moving to another country - different language, different work/life mix, different mindset…different everything - the best thing to integrating into a culture (aside from marrying someone there) is getting stuck into a company.</p>

<p>The thing is - as a non-EU citizen, you need to have the company sponsor you. That means them navigating the changing channels of immigration policies, tax credits and financial barriers, etc. Very few are inclined, unless you possess a skill that is in need, and happily web development is such a skill. The problem is, ultimately, you can be too jacketed in a company, especially when they know you can&#8217;t actually leave without leaving the country as well. </p>

<p>I&#8217;ve been fortunate in my first two companies - the initial group were tied to government and big business, and could move glacially slow, but we were asked to always innovate and so we went from FrontPage websites to Flash (yes, sorry, it was 2000) and up to Broadvision and Documentum-based sites. The latter also goes to show that often large organizations are moved to change not by needed technology but by valued partnerships. Documentum, a great package for document storage and archival, can&#8217;t make a website without considerable back-end programming. Ultimately we moved on to a smaller application, ExpressionEngine, that did more than either of the previous powerhouse efforts - but only with major management changes. </p>

<p>The next jump went to a company who has long-since run fast and actively tried new technologies, but it too suffered from politics and internal wrangling. I came to work on the EE platform, and while I (and others) could try many options, the final choice of Wordpress was made long ago, for reasons long since invalidated. So, considering the number of css developers alone who can mark-up a WP template, it&#8217;s no surprise they no-longer do new development in-house - far too expensive. Still, you grow and learn, and they were fantastic people to work with—one of the few groups I&#8217;ll genuinely miss. </p>

<p>So here I stand - where to next? </p>

<p>I love the Netherlands, but they&#8217;re often more management-driven than solution-driven. Do I work for another company? Do I start out on my own. My heart says the latter, but previous work habit instills apprehension, and that can divert energies. Must. Stay. Focused. </p>

<p>Where to next&#8230;that&#8217;s the $2010 question&#8230;
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2010-01-01T09:59:00+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/2010_&#45;_now_is_the_time/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Hell freezes over</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/hell_freezes_over/</link>
      <description>If possibly only to shut me up (yeah, right) Strider Software has finally released Typestyler for OS X. 

What is that &#45; 8&#45;9 years? Does anyone have a workflow that can use this still?</description>
      <dc:subject>IT notes, Malarkey</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay - sour grapes on my part, but at least they finally released something. I will reserve judgement until read real stories of people relying upon it for work, but congratulations to the group there in getting it out. </p>

<p>So what do I moan about now?
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-10-16T22:19:23+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/hell_freezes_over/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Paul Carvill understands me</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/paul_carvill_understands_me/</link>
      <description>&#8220;Why front&#45;end developers are so important to the future of businesses on the web&#8221;
or How traditional businesses who have moved to the web regularly undervalue their front&#45;end web developers, and are worse off because of that.</description>
      <dc:subject>IT notes, Personal</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favourite quote:
</p><blockquote><p>The modern web developer has huge amounts of value to offer a business. Indeed the type of professional you often find in this role encapsulates the very best the web has to offer:
</p><p><li></p><p>up-to-date knowledge of available and emerging technologies</p><p></li></p>
<p><li></p><p>extensive experience of implementing de facto web standards and programming patterns</p><p></li></p>
<p><li></p><p>database configuration and data manipulation</p><p></li></p>
<p><li></p><p>implementation across multiple platforms and legacy software applications</p><p></li></p>
<p><li></p><p>provisioning for mobile devices</p><p></li></p>
<p><li></p><p>data aggregation</p><p></li></p>
<p><li></p><p>graphics sourcing and creation</p><p></li></p>
<p><li></p><p>search engine optimisation (SEO)</p><p></li></p>
<p><li></p><p>a thorough understanding of the aesthetics and parameters of designing for the web</p><p></li></p>
</blockquote>

<p>This and more are true - very often, as front-end developer, the definition of our work is to make the whole of the development process <b>seamless</b>. In a world where the squeaky wheels get the grease, making everything &#8220;just work&#8221; somewhat condemn us to political obscurity within the organization. So I&#8217;ve learned to move-on more often; that seems to do the trick. </p>

<p>Yes - this is a call-out. More fun to come soon. 
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-09-26T03:11:25+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/paul_carvill_understands_me/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Balsamiq &#45; Wireframe prototyping that works</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/balsamiq_&#45;_wireframe_prototyping_that_works/</link>
      <description>You&#8217;re a developer. Your marketing people need to put up a website for a project, but not all the elements are defined. In fact, they say &#8220;just build something, we&#8217;ll give you text later. Just make it look nice.&#8221; 

Suddenly, your blood runs cold.</description>
      <dc:subject>IT notes</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a professional developer for years, first in the bad-old pre-bubble days to now. Worked for start-ups, governments, internet and brick-and-mortar, magazines online and off. Time is often used up early in the process - and often the final stage, development, has the tightest of schedules. Often the client or business developer has an idea of what they want, but not a clear view. You, the developer and programmer, think you have an open slate, but in reality you&#8217;re often one step away from a usability nightmare. How do you get the client to understand the needs of the visitor, the focus of the site, text vs. space, etc when they&#8217;re focusing only on colors. First things first - what did you <b>really</b> want to build? </p>

<p>Enter stage left - <a href="http://www.balsamiq.com/products/mockups/" title="Balsamiq">Balsamiq Mockups</a>. </p>

<p>Think of it as a Mockup Engine - and a brilliant one at that. &#8220;Drag and Drop&#8221; components on the page, but the components are smart enough to scale accordingly without distorting. For example, drop a window component, with complete with control elements, on the layout and stretch it - the window grows but the controls stay rooted in place! Move it around, add features, drag more components down from the menu and, well, here - just look for yourself:
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-09-21T16:16:31+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/balsamiq_&#45;_wireframe_prototyping_that_works/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>jQtouch&#8230;oooooh!</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/jqtouch...oooooh/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jqtouch.com/">This looks promising</a>, a jQuery library for mobile Safari developers. Makes your website touch-accessible, much as a native iPhone/iPod Touch application. </p>

<p>I have an immediate need for this.&nbsp; (grin!)
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-09-01T07:51:49+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/jqtouch...oooooh/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>We don&#8217;t talk anymore&#8230;</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/we_dont_talk_anymore/</link>
      <description></description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-06-12T18:50:24+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/we_dont_talk_anymore/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>This. Is. News?</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/this._is._news/</link>
      <description>Look, I like Obama as much as the next guy, but the press has got to get some scope &#45; is this really news? 

So much for the integrity of the news (not Obama, mind you &#45; he just wanted a frikken burger).</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<object height="394" width="448"><param name="movie" value="http://www.nbclosangeles.com/syndication?id=44384822&amp;path=%2Fhome%2Ftop_stories"/><embed src="http://www.nbclosangeles.com/syndication?id=44384822&amp;path=%2Fhome%2Ftop_stories"  type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" wmode="transparent" allowfullscreen="true" height="394" width="448"></embed><p style="font-size:small">View more news videos at: <a href="http://www.nbclosangeles.com/video">http://www.nbclosangeles.com/video</a>.</p></object>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-05-07T05:12:10+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/this._is._news/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Was my long&#45;overdue vacation fun?</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/was_my_long&#45;overdue_vacation_fun/</link>
      <description>Yes.</description>
      <dc:subject>Personal</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.shortcuts.nl/images/uploads/images/Koh_Lanta_sunset.JPG"><img src="http://www.shortcuts.nl/images/uploads/images/Koh-Lanta-sunset_lo.jpg" border="0" alt="image" name="image" width="440" height="330" /></a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-04-10T07:36:09+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/was_my_long&#45;overdue_vacation_fun/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>This is why you&#8217;re fat, part 2&#8230;</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/this_is_why_youre_fat_part_2/</link>
      <description>CBS News in America visits the Heart Attack Grill in Arizona&#8230; My chest hurts.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zbKRSYAuSNg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zbKRSYAuSNg&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

<p>Sure the nurses are beautiful, but an 8000-calorie burger??
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-04-07T08:38:25+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/this_is_why_youre_fat_part_2/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Typestyler &#45; STILL the Greatest Vaporware program for the Mac&#8230;</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/typestyler_&#45;_still_the_greatest_vaporware_program_for_the_mac/</link>
      <description>Seriously, this has gone on FAR too long&#8230;</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back last year, after waiting since the <b>inception</b> of OS X for a version of Typestyler that would run natively, <a href="http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/comments/the_oldest_vaporware_in_the_macintosh_world/" title="Typestyler - the oldest vaporware in the Macintosh world. ">I wrote a article calling it out as the &#8220;oldest vaporware in the Mac world&#8221;</a> and how misleading their ad on MacSurfer was. &#8220;Works great in Classic. Native version on the way&#8221;...yeah, Don&#8217;t hold your breath.</p>

<p><b>&#8220;Works great in Classic&#8221; - Um, what&#8217;s Classic?</b><br />
It seems their people have enough time to read my post and respond with reasons why, but not enough time to actually write the software or change the ad to address the issue with a timetable. We&#8217;re now nearly <b>3 years</b> since the eviction of Classic from the modern Intel-based Mac and a fully-working TypeStylerX is STILL no where to be seen. While I gave them some benefit of the doubt, my doubts are more concrete now. This is ridiculous - It&#8217;s as if Duke Nukem is doing the coding! (<i>nerd joke - sorry</i>).</p>

<p>Now - don&#8217;t get me wrong. You can&#8217;t make it, for one reason or another, that&#8217;s your choice and I&#8217;m good with that. I&#8217;m not a fan who&#8217;s going to howl if the application won&#8217;t appear magically before me. If you threw in the towel, good for you - go sit on a beach. Have a refreshing beverage. Fine - just <b>stop</b> advertising and acting as if it&#8217;s coming!</p>

<p><b>Enough already!</b><br />
Seriously, this advertising has got to stop. It&#8217;s now bait and switch, nothing more. No updates, no newer posts aside from the original claim that &#8220;<a href="http://www.typestyler.com/pages/TSX.html" title="sorry - we really DON'T fully work in Classic&#8230;">the current TypeStyler 3.7.2 (one known issue) runs fine under the Classic environment of OS X of all past and currently shipping PowerPC Macs</a>&#8221;. It&#8217;s the same page from last year and the year before. </p>

<p>I&#8217;m tempted to go and buy the application in the states where the programmer and MacSurfer live, just so I can have the State Attorneys General go after them for mail fraud. Because that&#8217;s what it appears to be now - there&#8217;s no OS X product, no timetable, and a constant advert at the top of MacSurfer for a vaporware version that just never seems to appear. </p>

<p>People moan about how some Mac software packages may appear shady - by comparison, this is an eclipse. I know people who have bought this, lumbered through in Classic to get it to work and expected support and now pretty much know they&#8217;ll never, ever see a native version. Many have had to upgrade and have left it behind, and good riddance, but seriously - this has got to stop. 
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-04-03T15:02:26+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/typestyler_&#45;_still_the_greatest_vaporware_program_for_the_mac/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>THIS is why you&#8217;re fat</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/this_is_why_youre_fat/</link>
      <description>Amazing micro photo website with some of the most disgusting fast&#45;food you&#8217;ve ever seen.</description>
      <dc:subject>Idle Chatter, Malarkey</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Witness this: <b>The Double Bacon Hamburger Fatty Melt</b></p>

<p><img src="http://www.shortcuts.nl/images/uploads/images/fat.jpg" border="0" alt="image" name="image" width="450" height="300" /> </p>

<p>Three bacon-stuffed grilled cheese sandwichs for buns, cheese, bacon and two four-ounce beefs patties.</p>

<p><i>I only just <b>wrote</b> that and now I need to go spinning&#8230;</i>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-02-11T13:23:08+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/this_is_why_youre_fat/</guid>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Almost there&#8230;</title>
      <link>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/almost_there/</link>
      <description>A new Vitaal.nl is in development &#45; a just few days away of being finished.

We have to get the data from Green Valley (the old hosters) and insert it . And they&#8217;re not being friendly&#8230;</description>
      <dc:subject>Idle Chatter, IT notes</dc:subject>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:date>2009-02-11T12:57:20+00:00</dc:date>
      <guid>http://www.shortcuts.nl/index.php/weblog/almost_there/</guid>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>